Ideal Vs practical design process

Design processes can be classified into ideal and practical, each with its set of advantages and disadvantages. In general, an ideal design process follows a systematic approach that prioritizes user-centered design and feedback mechanisms to iterate on the designs. On the other hand, a practical design process makes necessary compromises to meet project constraints and deadlines.

Designing for a new product

In this scenario, a user-centered, Design Thinking approach is ideal. For instance, Airbnb's design process prioritizes users' needs and feedback, leading to an innovative and unique product. Conversely, Juicero failed to use a Design Thinking approach, resulting in a complicated, expensive product that did not address users' needs.

Designing for a complex system

Systems Thinking approach is ideal in this scenario. Tesla's design process considers the interconnections and interdependencies of car components, resulting in a holistic and integrated product that meets users' needs. In contrast, an overly complex and convoluted design may lead to poor adoption rates and a negative user experience.

Tight Deadline

When under a tight deadline, creating a basic version of the product with pre-built UI components and templates is practical. However, when practicality overshadows usability and functionality, as seen in Healthcare.gov's launch, it can lead to numerous usability issues that can hurt the product's success.

In conclusion, while an ideal design process is always preferred, practicality dictates that designers need to make compromises in certain scenarios. Validating the design through user testing, feedback, and metrics analysis can help ensure that the product meets user needs, is functional, and usable.